Sunday, January 09, 2005

Gen S

My friend, Ray was commenting in his newly created blog that many Singaporeans have problems with articulation, even those who are studying in local universities. We are neither good in our adopted business language, English nor our national language of Malay (Berhasa Melayu). In fact many locals do not even know basic Malay. Yet looking at the situation on the whole, it could be because our education system is flawed. Many teachers themselves are bad practitioners of the language, resulting in Bad English being circulated.

I remember reading an article written to the Straits Times by an undergraduate who was from top schools in Singapore, Jamie about how our intellectual elite do not think critically (I have taken the liberty to put the entire article here as the online version has expired):

Jan 1, 2005 Our smart students not willing to think critically

I FIND it ironic that after decades of praising the education system for producing students who are adept at memorising formulas, a skill that has enabled them to be world beaters in international mathematics and science competitions, the Government now wants youths who are able to express their opinions about what sort of Singapore they want to build.

Unfortunately, as in the case of the bilingual policy, we cannot have our cake and eat it, a fact that has taken the Government some time to figure out.

The more we reward students for their ability to memorise model answers, the less willing students will be to use their critical minds. Why should they risk getting low grades by expressing critical, unorthodox views when it is so easy for them to just be spoon-fed by their teachers?

In his article, 'Lost generation or future leaders: Our call' (ST, Dec 30), Mr Verghese Matthews questions whether figures of authority have instilled in young people the critical spirit and the moral courage to use it for the good of society.

He is optimistic that there is hope yet for Singapore's future: 'I am confident that there are many young critical thinkers in our society who are testing the waters.'

I applaud Mr Matthews' attempt to bring into public discussion the question of whether enough is being done to encourage critical thinking among Singaporean youths, but alas his article has come two decades too late for my generation.

Having gone to a top secondary school and junior college, and now doing my undergraduate studies at a local university, I can safely say that there is an appalling lack of passionate, critical thinkers, even among the intellectual elite of Singapore's youth.

It is not that my generation does not have smart people with critical-thinking skills. The problem is that too many of my peers lack the moral courage to speak out after going through an education system that rewards conformity and punishes originality.

We have become a generation of sheep, too afraid to challenge the authority of our herders. The few wolves left among us who do challenge the status quo run the risk of being labelled as anarchists and troublemakers.

It is no wonder that many have become so jaded that they no longer feel it worth their while to carry on expressing their views, choosing instead to either remain quiet or to head for greener pastures elsewhere, in which case they run the risk of being labelled as 'quitters'.

In both cases, the ultimate loser is Singapore, for conformity results in stagnation, while 'invention is always born of dissension', as the French philosopher Jean-Francois Lyotard so rightly pointed out.

In 1784, the great German philosopher Immanuel Kant wrote his famous essay 'What is Enlightenment?' in which he appealed to his countrymen to have the courage and resolution to use their own reasoning skills instead of blindly depending on the authority of so-called experts. More than two centuries on and in a country far away from his beloved Prussia, his emotional appeal still remains relevant.

Sadly, the works of Kant seldom take pride of place on the bookshelves of many of our policy-makers, who would much rather fill their shelves with more 'practical' books, such as those by economist John Maynard Keynes.

The price Singapore is paying for their narrow reading habits is an entire generation of lost sheep: Gen S. My generation.
Jamie Han Li Chou

3 comments:

Enigmatic Butterfly said...

The comment about the sheep reminds me of a Far Side cartoon. It's one of my favourites and is stuck on my wall permanently. It's a little tongue in cheek. I can't seem to find a picture of it online to link to. So let me attempt to describe it.

It's basically a whole bunch of sheep munching grass in the paddock. And there is one sheep on it's hind legs in the middle with two of it's feet/hands up in the air exclaiming happily, "Wait! Wait! Listen to me! ... We don't *have* to be just sheep!" What's even more funny is the looks on the other sheep who either have non-plussed/indifferent or 'are you crazy?' looks on their faces...

*grin*

Perhaps not appropriate for your motivating post and implications of a generation of people who should think outside the square. In fact this comment probably defeats the purpose entirely.

Nonetheless, the comment about sheep reminded me of that cartoon, and i just had to share. Gary Larson is a genuis.

Zan said...

Oh yes, i love Far Side cartoons as well.

The cartoons say so much though so simple... a work of a genius. Thanks for sharing =)

Zan said...

Point noted and corrected. =)