Casino debate?

Soon the government will reveal the results of the casino debate but in some ways the die is already cast as Warren Fernandez said. (See Public Cynism) Yet many are still hopeful and the media also carried a television programme for people to air their views. There is also an action group called Families Against the Casino Threat in Singapore (FACTS) which is sending an online petition against the casino (http://www.facts.com.sg).

I don't wish to sound like a wet blanket but the truth is even if the government shelves the plan this round, what makes you think the plan would not be brought up again till one day they just approve it? It will be a matter of time, sooner if not later, the government will come out with politically correct reasons to support their decision based on the rebuttal of feedback from her people.

Singaporeans should stop wasting their breaths arguing over a foregone conclusion and the government should really come clean with their intentions instead of leading her people on in senseless circles. Personally I am not in favour of the casino, as like my friend in Myopic Singapore, I believe that we can do well setting ourselves apart by having some other attractions. However instead of wasting time debating again, why not focus our energy into more constructive actions like laying guidelines and stating things we wish to see in the casino cum family resort? Here are some suggestions:

1. It is idealistic to believe that the entrance fee of $1000 or whatever amount will deter gamblers. Instead gamblers should be advised through public messages to think about their families before laying it all on the line.

2. The legal entry age should be at least 21 years, such that it will exclude as far as possible guys who are still in National Service. Guys who have served conscription would know how damaging the temptation can be. The legal entry age would also effectively exclude those who are still studying and perhaps the public messages could also be carried out in schools.

3. The resort should be a family-friendly and not just only for those who can afford it. A resort placed on Singaporean soil should reach out and benefit Singaporeans as far as possible. Certain areas may be dedicated to drawing top dollars but ultimately it shouldn't be a case where majority of locals are denied entry.

4. Part of the resort's profit should be pumped back to allay social costs. It could be to fund public messages and even charities. This will make the resort more mindful of its duty to the community. It shouldn't be a case where taxpayer's money is used to clean up any undesirable consequences.

These are only some of the general ideas. To have a better discussion with her people, the government should be more transparent with the plans.